[Salon] Gaza and International Law



Gaza and International Law

Summary: while the UK government continues its support for Israel’s war against Gaza and as civilian casualties mount inexorably claim and counter-claims have been made about the role of international law in the conflict; today’s newsletter makes abundantly clear there should be no confusion.

We thank Sir Vincent Fean and Mike Scott-Baumann for permission to republish their analysis in today’s newsletter.  For more on the work of the Balfour Project which advocates for peace, justice and equal rights in Palestine/Israel we direct you to the website. Here is the website for SOAS Influencing the Corridors of Power project.

As the crisis in Gaza, Israel and the West Bank intensifies daily, it is vital for the international community to stop this war, uphold international law, support Israelis and Palestinians and work towards lasting peaceful solutions in Israel and the Occupied Palestinian Territories (OPT). The well-being of all those in the region is at stake, and their safety can never be achieved by violence. Four points of international law need emphasising, which are explained in the open letter concerning Gaza to the Prime Minister, Foreign Secretary and Defence Secretary 26 October 2023 from lawyers and others.

First, the actions of Hamas in Israel – the murder of hundreds of civilians and other atrocities – are crimes against humanity.[1] They are also war crimes, as is the taking of hostages. Under the Geneva Conventions, Hamas’ actions cannot be justified by any previous acts of war by Israel. Furthermore, under international law, Hamas’ actions do not justify crimes by Israel (UK lawyers’ letter, p. 5). [2]

Second, Israel has the right in international law to respond in self-defence to the attacks of 7 October 2023. However, such responses must distinguish between civilians and combatants and therefore avoid such blanket techniques as area bombardment and the damage of civilian infrastructure such as hospitals.

Third, in armed conflict, the civilians of Gaza have the right to protection according to the framework that governs how nations respond to attack. Whatever the provocation, every nation is bound to comply with the rules of war (UK lawyers’ letter, p. 6). These were established to limit the harm that can be inflicted on other human beings, however strong the desire for retribution. The complete siege of Gaza, the evacuation orders and the population transfers are violations of international law.[3] Depriving over two million civilians (almost half of whom are children) of food, water and fuel is a war crime.[4]

Fourth, the UK itself must not violate international humanitarian law.[5] This means the UK must be gravely concerned and not encourage, aid or assist such violations. Furthermore, UK nationals who aid and abet international crimes are liable for prosecution both in the UK and before the ICC.[6] We call on all peers and MPs to urge HM Government to fulfil its obligations under the Geneva Conventions, condemn the killing of all civilians and to support all measures required to prevent further killings [7] These must include:

  • an immediate humanitarian cease-fire by all belligerents
  • the release of all hostages
  • providing unrestricted aid to civilians in Gaza – fuel, clean water, food, medical help and supplies
  • protecting the human rights of both Israelis and Palestinians, including guaranteeing the right of forced transferees to return home
  • working with partners for a definitive resolution of the conflict realising the Palestinian right to self-determination and mutual security for both peoples

With the death toll approaching 10,000, several graveyards in the Gaza Strip are full so corpses are being collectively buried in mass graves [photo credit: @Timesofgaza]

For further information contact the author at vincentfean@gmail.com, and visit the Balfour Project website. Contact Prof Alison Scott-Baumann for access to other experts at as150@soas.ac.uk, and visit the website for more information.

[1]  ICRC Customary International Humanitarian Law Database rule 1 (Principle of Distinction between Civilians and Combatants); also rules 7, 11 and 71

[2]   Ibid. rule 146 (Belligerent reprisals against persons protected by the Geneva Conventions are prohibited); see also GCI, Art 46; GCII, Art 47; and GCIII, 13

[3]  ICRC Customary International Humanitarian Law Database rule 129 and rule 131 (The Act of Displacement and Treatment of Displaced Persons)

[4] Ibid. rule 55 (Access for Humanitarian Relief for Civilians in Need)

[5]  1949 Geneva Conventions, Common Art 1

[6]  Geneva Conventions Act 1957 and International Criminal courts Act 2001.

[7] ICRC Protocol to the Geneva Conventions of 12 August 1949 and relating to the Protection of Victims of International Armed Conflicts (Protocol 1), 8 June 1977, 1125 UNTS3


Members can leave comments about this newsletter on the Today's Newsletter page of the Arab Digest website
follow us on TwitterLinkedIn and Facebook

Copyright © 2023 Arab Digest, All rights reserved.
You are receiving this email as you are subscribed to the Arab Digest.
Our mailing address is:
Arab Digest
3rd Floor
207 Regent Street
London, W1B 3HH
United Kingdom



 To unsubscribe from this list email editor@arabdigest.org


This archive was generated by a fusion of Pipermail (Mailman edition) and MHonArc.